What Are the Types of WAFs?
- 2.6k Views
- 7 min. read
Introduction
As digital transformation accelerates and web applications become central to business, deploying the right WAF is crucial. But what exactly are the types of WAFs, and how do they differ?
This article explores three main types of Web Application Firewalls: cloud-based, software-based, and hardware-based. Each type offers distinct benefits and limitations based on organizational needs, security postures, and IT infrastructure.
To gain a better understanding of these deployment types, it is beneficial to first comprehend the basics of what is a WAF?
Understanding Web Application Firewalls (WAFs)
Before exploring the various types, it’s essential to grasp the function of a WAF. A Web Application Firewall (WAF) is a security tool designed to filter, monitor, and block HTTP traffic to and from web applications. Unlike conventional firewalls that target network-layer threats, WAFs work at the application layer (Layer 7 of the OSI model) to protect against prevalent attacks such as:
-
SQL injection
-
Cross-site scripting (XSS)
-
Cookie poisoning
-
HTTP floods and DDoS attacks
-
API abuse and manipulations
WAFs utilize WAF security rules and behavioral policies to permit or deny traffic according to established patterns or anomalies. These rules are set up through WAF policies that can be adjusted to meet changing security requirements.
WAFs analyze incoming traffic to your application, helping to prevent exploitation of vulnerabilities while facilitating smooth and secure user access.
Types of WAFs
Three main types of WAFs exist, categorized by deployment architecture and maintenance models. They are:
-
1. Cloud-Based Web Application Firewall
-
2. Software-Based Web Application Firewall
-
3. Hardware-Based Web Application Firewall
Let’s examine each type, covering its deployment model, benefits, drawbacks, and appropriateness for various organizations.
1. Cloud-Based Web Application Firewall
A cloud-based Web Application Firewall (WAF) is a completely hosted solution that is offered through a cloud platform. Typically presented as Security-as-a-Service (SECaaS), it demands little setup from the user.
These modern solutions frequently incorporate AI-powered WAF features that enable dynamic threat detection and adaptive rule modifications.
a) Key Features:
-
Implemented without tangible infrastructure.
-
Centralized threat intelligence management.
-
Managed updates and upkeep.
-
Accessible through inline and API-based out-of-path deployment models.
b) Advantages:
-
Cost-effective and adaptable for businesses of every size.
-
Quick setup needing little technical know-how.
-
Automatic updates incorporating evolving threat intelligence.
-
Perfect for multi-cloud and hybrid setups.
-
Consolidated management and reporting across various applications.
c) Disadvantages:
-
Traffic redirection can lead to increased latency.
-
Limited control and customization options are available.
-
It may fail to meet strict data residency regulations in certain industries (such as government and defense).
-
Best Fit:
Organizations that focus on fast deployment, lower operational costs, and uniform protection in distributed environments. Those looking for advanced protective features like zero-day protection in WAF might discover that cloud-based solutions are more effective.
2. Software-Based Web Application Firewall
Often referred to as a host-based WAF, the software-based version is installed directly on a virtual machine or within the application environment. It can be deployed on-premises, in public clouds, or within private cloud setups.
Organizations may select this option when configuring a WAF to accommodate custom workloads or microservices.
a) Key Features:
-
Tailored deployment for distinct application environments.
-
Facilitates east-west traffic observation in microservices (e.g., containerized applications).
-
Operates as agents or virtual appliances.
b) Advantages:
-
Reduced initial investment compared to hardware-based WAFs.
-
Enhanced flexibility and customization options for internal security teams.
-
Efficient in cloud-native and container-based environments.
c) Disadvantages:
-
Complicated setup and configuration.
-
Utilizes resources from the application server.
-
Demands frequent updates and user maintenance.
-
Unsuited for organizations lacking a dedicated security team.
-
Best Fit:
Medium to large enterprises looking for a balance between cost-effectiveness and control, particularly those managing containerized or hybrid environments. Software WAFs can generate more WAF false positives if not correctly configured during setup.
3. Hardware-Based Web Application Firewall
A hardware-based WAF, often referred to as a network-based WAF, is a physical device deployed within a data center or local network. Generally located near the application servers, it is characterized by low latency and high throughput.
a) Key Features:
-
Deployed on-site as a hardware device.
-
Connected with internal network systems.
-
Typically accommodates air-gapped setups.
Organizations that manage IP blacklisting in WAF or IP whitelisting in WAF At scale, this setup may be beneficial.
b) Advantages:
-
Reduced latency thanks to on-site processing.
-
Excellent performance and throughput.
-
Easily customizable for specific network needs.
-
Ideal for air-gapped or high-security settings.
c) Disadvantages:
-
Significant initial investment and continuous upkeep.
-
Demands specialized IT support and a physical area.
-
Inadequate for rapid deployment adjustments.
-
Manual handling of updates is required.
-
Best Fit:
Large companies or governmental organizations that have rigorous security demands and infrastructure for on-site appliances. These demonstrate exceptional resilience against hackers bypassing a WAF utilizing obfuscation methods or encryption payloads.
Comparison Table of WAF Types
Let’s look at the comparison of different types of WAF :
| Feature/Type | Cloud-Based WAF | Software-Based WAF | Hardware-Based WAF |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Deployment |
Fully cloud-hosted |
Virtual/agent-based |
On-premise hardware |
|
Setup Complexity |
Low |
Moderate to High |
High |
|
Customization |
Limited |
Moderate to High |
High |
|
Maintenance |
Managed by the provider |
Managed by an organization |
Managed by an organization |
|
Latency |
Medium (due to redirection) |
Medium to High (resource-dependent) |
Low |
|
Cost |
Low to Moderate (subscription-based) |
Moderate |
High (capital expenditure) |
|
Best For |
All business sizes |
Cloud-native organizations |
Large enterprises, defense |
Choosing the Right WAF for Your Organization
Let’s look at the comparison of different types of WAF :
-
Business Scale and Budget: Smaller companies might find cloud-based WAFs advantageous, whereas larger enterprises are more likely to invest in hardware-based options.
-
Application Structure: Software-based WAFs are often better suited for containerized environments, offering greater flexibility.
-
Regulatory Compliance: In regulated sectors, on-premise hardware might be required.
-
Technical Skills: Organizations lacking in-house security expertise may prefer managed cloud services.
A proper WAF rule set, along with intelligent threat detection and WAF behavioral analysis, plays a vital role in minimizing false positives and enhancing detection rates.
Grasping the trade-offs among control, cost, latency, and customization will help steer the choice of the most efficient WAF deployment model.
Which WAF Is Right for You? Cloud, Software, or Hardware?
The digital landscape is constantly changing, bringing new threats to web applications. Installing a Web Application Firewall has become essential rather than optional. Whether you opt for a cloud-based, software-based, or hardware-based WAF, the critical factor is selecting a solution that fits your business’s architecture, budget, and security requirements.
By understanding the types of WAFs and their respective advantages, organizations can develop a more resilient, secure, and scalable web application infrastructure that effectively defends against contemporary cyber threats. Additionally, gaining advanced insights requires exploring how WAF evasion techniques are used and how WAFs detect new threats.
Prophaze a Unified Approach to Modern WAF Needs
For organizations looking for next-generation WAF capabilities, Prophaze WAAP offers a powerful solution that combines cloud-based agility with advanced customization and AI-driven threat detection. Supporting multi-cloud environments and real-time analytics, Prophaze simplifies application security while providing robust zero-day protection without sacrificing performance.
In the evolving WAF landscape, Prophaze is an intelligent, scalable choice for businesses aiming to streamline and strengthen their web application defenses.
